Graffiti: Art or Vandalism Essay - 1915 Words.
Sam Cowey Graffiti has been around for more than half a decade and practiced worldwide. However there is debate between whether it is a form of art or vandalism. Graffiti artists’ debate that many do not understand the reason most graffiti artist take the risk of incarceration, fines, injuries, and in some cases death to paint a wall.
Graffiti is an interesting topic because it sparks conflict and debate all over the world. It is important or worth studying graffiti because to many people around the world graffiti is not a good sight to see, mainly because it is not normal to them, foreign, unknown and a problem to everyday organised living.
In this discursive essay i will be showing the points for and against graffiti and whether it is considered vandalism or art. Some of the major points around this is does it matter where the graffiti is drawn or who by or is it as simple as its on a public building and no matter how artistic it looks its vandalism.
Graffiti is a true art with different meanings that involves many styles and risks that can damage artists physically and socially. Graffiti is an art, not a simple tagging on a trash can or an alley wall but an actual mural that represents meanings in every detail, style, and even every color.
Graffiti is a type of art, people don't like it and that's fine, as art is subjective. However, it is ridiculous when you didn't like graffiti and saying that is illegal. If you find a piece of sculpture on the street and you hate it, would it be vandalism and illegal as well.
The element of surprise, the public and free nature of the work, the tinge of illegality, the idea of turning vandalism into beauty are all important elements of Fairey’s art. To refrain from posting his pieces covertly in public spaces throughout the world would change the very nature and meaning of his work.
Essay on Graffiti: Art or Vandalism.recognized as art and vandalism. The individual is often faced with uncertainty when the topic of graffiti arises. The public often portray graffiti as a destructive act towards his or her surroundings however; graffiti can also be considered a form of self-expression.
While some people consider graffiti to be an art form, most people think of it as vandalism. It is destructive, costly, chaotic and repulsive. It is also done without the consent of the property owners, whether private or public.
Graffiti: Art or Vandalism? Graffiti is a true art with different meanings that involves many styles and risks that can damage artists physically and socially. Graffiti is an art, not a simple tagging on a trash can or an alley wall but an actual mural that represents meanings in every detail, style, and even every color.
To some graffiti is an art form worthy of display in galleries but for others it is merely vandalism. As graffiti can be done on any property, it is seldom considered an art form as it might be deemed to be destructing someone else's property.
Depends on the work and the place. A good graffiti in an authorized or free space can be art. Only basic tags or a graffiti in a non-authorized place it’s vandalism. Sometimes, a great graffiti can be art (by the qualiti of work) and vandalism (because of the plave where it is).
Most people can argue that there is a fine distinction between what is recognized as art and vandalism. The individual is often faced with uncertainty when the topic of graffiti arises. The public often portray graffiti as a destructive act towards his or her surroundings however; graffiti can also be considered a form of self-expression.
Art is considered as a way to describe emotions of artists and it is known to be done in the traditional manner; in closed rooms and on canvas, paper or other media. There is a heated debate that goes with the origination of graffiti art. Quite a few people consider graffiti was introduced to the world as a reply to modernism and social division.
